To whom it may concern,
Preface
Robots are required to have full autonomy from humans, technical designs, and ingenious programming by their developers.
We realized full autonomy from people by clarifying the role of striker and Goalie.
・Strikers
Less lack of progress : Can capture the ball just outside the line
Less Pushing : Shoot from outside Penalty area
Less Multiple defense : The robot will not enter its own penalty area
・Goalie
Robots are allowed to use the cross-bar in order to avoid entering the goal : Detect the cross-bar with the touch sensor and move forward.
Technical design and ingenious programming are done, and it also moves forward as judged by the robot itself, just as the goalie in human soccer.
It is a question about the movement of the Goalie.
Which of 1 to 4 is the correct judgment?( 3.5 Agility)
-
Because the Strikers can chase the ball, the Goalie does not have to follow the ball.
-
Because the Strikers can chase the ball, the Goalie does not have to follow the ball.
Goalie must be constructed and programmed in a way that their movement is not limited to only one dimension (that means one axis).
This is because easy and effective ways obstruct the development of technology.
Advanced control technology is required(For example, front / rear position control by a distance sensor, rotation suppression control by a gyro sensor These comprehensive feedback control) for moving linearly using 4-axis Omni drive.
It’s enough to drive using more than two axes regardless of how it moves
- Technical design and ingenious programming are done, and it also moves forward as judged by the robot itself, just as the goalie in human soccer.
To avoid interrupting the game, we recommend that you demonstrate in the Pre-match meeting.
- The referee do not consider technical design, and ingenious programming.
If movement appears to be only left and right movement, it is determined to be 1 axis drive.
If the referee judges that it is single axis drive, it is assumed that there is no agility.
Thanks!
Tomo