with double defense rules in the past we didn’t award goals that might have been scored if there had not been a double defense situation. In the same way we will not be scoring goals that might have been scored if there was no out of bounds robot in the way in penalty area.
I don’t have decision making authority though, I’m just answering from my experience as a referee. I hope it helps.
Hi David,
I think, “not scoring” is the right answer. The out of bounds rule implements two different reasons:
a) out of bounds and
b) pushed out.
This decision between these two reasons is even harder to make in a defense situation in front of a goal.
For a robot out of bounds with reason a) there is the 1 minute penalty. That is hard enough and will lead to a goal in most situations anyway.